The Importance Of Being Sanju
August 6, 2007
I had confused feelings when I first heard the judgement on Sanjay Dutt last week. My initial thoughts were how would Sanjay Dutt, the loveable Munnabhai of Bollywood, cope with six years of jail. But at the same time, the fact that our judicial system had viewed him as a citizen, who went against the law, not considering his Bollywood celebrity status, was reassuring.
The news channels kept beaming his images all day long, in addition to interviews of scores of Bollywood icons refuting the “unfair” verdict. The next day, newspapers were splashed with statements of every possible Bollywood actor condemning his imprisonment.
And that’s when it got on my nerves.
I know Mr. Dutt only from his films, but when the whole of Bollywood says, I can acknowledge that he is a nice guy. But does that take away the fact that (at one point of time) he was involved with the underworld and was in possession of arms? The law took its course, even if delayed, so why is the issue getting undeserved mileage? Sanju, might be a much-adulated public figure, but why is he being depicted as a child of a Higher God, who has been wronged in every way possible? Even a week after the trial, not an hour goes by when the news channels don’t have someone or the other voicing their sympathies to Sanju baba.
I’m not against Sanjay Dutt, nor do I have a problem if he is let off. But this issue is no longer about an individual. In a country where millions languish in jails, there would be many among them who would have undergone a transformation from their criminal past to a humane present or several innocent ones who are imprisoned without even being guilty. Has Bollywood thought about them? Would it be just to give preferrential treatment to an individual due to his star status and absolve him of his past guilts? If today one star gets to distort justice, tomorrow we may have others, who by their influence and media’s endorsement, will get away with more.
India is a free land and everyone of us has a right to opinion. But why are our news channels and newspapers trying to project this through the eyes of celebs by giving them undeserving coverage to lobby for an individual?
Have we run out of pertinent issues that impact the lives of a collective nation that the entire Indian media has the spotlight on a single man?
Entry Filed under: India, Mind Musings. .
5 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Twilight Fairy | August 6, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Lage raho punnu bhai :p. (at blogging i.e.)
2.
austere | August 6, 2007 at 5:24 pm
For the papers, sensationalism rules. Once you accept that, it is easy to calibrate front page news and tucked-in-a-corner critical national importance news. Earlier I thought only Gujju papers do this, but now I see TOI is indeed the leader.
See why I read the paper at night only?
Kode is a national hero, but will the D man let him live?
Woh toh gaya, mereko lagta.
What about the Abhi-Ash shaadi hype, on this silliness scale?
3.
sachin | August 9, 2007 at 12:05 pm
just want to make a point..
i am pretty sure that most of the bollywod celebs who support sanju on air might actually be supportive of the sentence,..
but they dont have it in them to say it on camera..
its a pity that not even one celeb has come forward and supported his sentence…
4.
sachin | August 9, 2007 at 12:06 pm
just want to make a point..
i am pretty sure that most of the bollywod celebs who support sanju on air might actually be supportive of the sentence,..
but they dont have it in them to say it on camera..
its a pity that not even one celeb has come forward and supported his sentence…
bye!
5.
sunflower | August 24, 2007 at 3:31 pm
This post mirrors my opinions exactly! Not only do I cringe at the crazy media, I can’t understand this whole hullabaloo about Sanju…
I mean, if his family did not have the strong political ties, would they have been able to release him the way they are able to? And would all of Bolywood have stood by him and not discrded him like a used tissue if he didn’t boast of the lineage he does?